Petitioner claimed sugarcane price dues from respondent society for session 2022-2023. Counsel agreed to dispose petition on same terms as coordinate bench order in Avanish Kumar case. Bench disposed petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of on same terms as in Avanish Kumar case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:224297-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38398 of 2023
Petitioner :- Bhagwat Saran Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Shukla,Ashutosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Udayan Nandan
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
(Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 28.11.2023
Sushil/-
Digitally signed by :- SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition regarding cane price dues can be disposed by order on same terms as coordinate bench case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Avanish Kumar & 2 Others Vs. State of U.P. & 4 OthersApplied¶7
Avanish Kumar & 2 Others Vs. State of U.P. & 4 Others in Writ-C No.-29905 of 2023,2023:AHC:176907-DB
Bhagwat Saran
State Of U.P.
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
Canes cooperative society
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Shiv Shanker Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
