A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel, despite the matter having been listed for decision.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:218336
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38041 of 2022 Petitioner :- Smt. Arti Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganesh Mani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinava Krishna Srivastava,Anand Prakash Paul
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 16.11.2023 RKM
Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Arti Mishra
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
