The petitioner failed to appear for hearing, leading to dismissal of the writ petition for want of prosecution. The interim order remains vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38001 of 2023
Petitioner :- Lalbahadur Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Sudhir Bharti
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Even in the revised call, none present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalbahadur
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
