The petitioner moved the Writ Court challenging an action under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The counsel requested dismissal as the matter was not pressed. The court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings.
Petitioner granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37558 of 2023
Petitioner :- Shiv Chand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Mishra,Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
"1. Counsel for the petitioner shall address the Court on the next date as to how the instant writ petition is maintainable for the expeditious disposal of the proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 at the instance of the petitioner who is the complainant.
2. On the request of the counsel for the petitioner, matter is adjourned.
3. Put up this matter as fresh on 6.12.2023."
Order Date :- 6.12.2023 C.Prakash
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Chand
State Of U.P.
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
Chandra Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
