Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent even after specific reminder regarding non-appearance in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37184 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sudha Jaiswal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neetu Singh,Prashant Kumar Bhardwaj,Ram Kishun Misra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
None present for the petitioner even in the revised call.
Sri Pankaj Srivastava, is present for the respondent-Bank. He invites our attention towards order dated 4.1.2023, which records that counsel for the petitioner was not present even on that date but the case was adjourned in the interest of justice.
It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Vikram D. Chauhan J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 18.1.2023 skv
Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudha Jaiswal
State Of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
