Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after an FIR was lodged against the second petitioner following the registration of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:230260
Court No. - 85
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36619 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Prinshi Agnihotri And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
List revised.
No one appears for the petitioners.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that in the instant matter F.I.R. has been lodged against petitioner no.2 on 29.09.2023, therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous and it may dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.12.2023 AKT
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Prinshi Agnihotri And Another
State Of U.P.
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
