The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Mahak Kumari as infructuous, accepting the Additional C.S.C.'s statement that an FIR under Section 366 IPC against an unknown person was lodged, rendering the petition unnecessary.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:206868
Court No. - 85
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35228 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mahak Kumari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anuj Agarwal,Harsh Vardhan Deshwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Learned Addl. C.S.C. states that in this matter first information report has been lodged against unknown person under Section 366 of IPC on 20.09.2023, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Vikram
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahak Kumari And Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
