Writ petition filed to command the Electricity Department to energize a sanctioned tube-well connection. Objection by the petitioner's brother was withdrawn, removing any impediment. Petition disposed.
Petition disposed; all pending applications disposed of in terms of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:134577-DB
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3175 of 2021
Petitioner :- Suman Devi Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
appearing on behalf of Lala Ram, who has applied for impleadment states that Lala Ram would not object to the erection of electricity line so as to energize the electricity connection sanctioned in favour of the petitioner. He states that both the connections may be permitted to run simultaneously.
Order Date :- 7.7.2023 S. Singh
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any impediment in energizing the electricity connection already sanctioned in favour of the petitioner after the objector consented?
Whether the Electricity Department should be commanded to energize the sanctioned connection?
Suman Devi
State of U P
Lala Ram
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
