The petitioner sought a direction to install a separate transformer for his tubewell and a decision on his representation regarding electricity supply. The Court, relying on the Electricity Department's instruction that supply was proper, dismissed the writ petition as misconceived.
Writ petition dismissed as misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:202777-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31333 of 2023
Petitioner :- Anwar Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi,Kartikeya Saran,Ravi Anand Agarwal,Surya Prakash Pandey
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 19.10.2023 SP/
Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court should direct the installation of a separate transformer for the petitioner's tubewell given the Electricity Department's instruction that supply was proper.
Whether the petitioner's representation dated 25.8.2023 requires a decision within a stipulated period.
Anwar Ahmad
State Of U.P.
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
