The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order cancelling an allotment. The court found no case for interference as the lower orders found the application maintainable issue. Consequently, the written petition was dismissed and any interim order was vacated.
Interim order vacated; Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3071 of 2007
Petitioner :- Smt. Son Piyari
Respondent :- Addl. Commissioenr Agra Division And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.N. Singh,Mahesh Narain Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 Kushal
Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application under Section 198(4) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act warrants interference by this Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Son Piyari
Addl. Commissioenr Agra Division And Others
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Kushal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
