The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not present despite a revised call. No interim order remains.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28482 of 2021
Petitioner :- Mohd. Azam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kunwar Mayank Singh,Ambrish Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Even in the revised call, none present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Azam
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
