Hon'ble AHC directed Respondent No.2 to decide a specific mutation application expeditiously within six months after affording hearing to affected parties.
Direction to decide Mutation application No. T20151506031523 expeditiously within six months after hearing affected parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:167477
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25581 of 2023
Petitioner :- Bharat Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 21.8.2023 Rakesh
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the competent authority was directed to decide a mutation application expeditiously.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of after issuing a direction for time-bound decision.
Bharat Yadav
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
