The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the counsel's statement before the bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:192505
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24167 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sarifuddin And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Suresh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1.Mr. Amish Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the petitioners submitted that writ petition has become infructuous, accordingly, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Mr. Sridhar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, counsel for the respondent No.4/ Land Management Committee, are present.
3. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.10.2023 PS*
Digitally signed by :- PRITI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarifuddin And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Chandra Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
