Court held the writ petition regarding election decision had lost efficacy as the election was concluded. Parties referred to appropriate election petition remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:142786-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23156 of 2023
Petitioner :- Haji Arif And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tanisha Jahangir Monir
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Since election to the local authority has already been concluded, as such, this writ petition has lost its efÏcacy. Even otherwise result of election can only be questioned in an appropriate election petition to be filed by the person aggrieved, in accordance with law.
Leaving it open for the parties to avail appropriate remedy, as per law, this petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 18.7.2023 Ranjeet Sahu
Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Haji Arif And 6 Others
State Of U.P. 6 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
