The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the FIR against one of the petitioners was lodged after the filing of the writ.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:135807
Court No. - 85
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19911 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sonam Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navaneet Kumar Shukla,Ravindra Kumar Chauhan,Shashank Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
List revised.
None present on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition, whereas learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the state-respondents is present.
Learned Additional Chief Standing counsel states that this writ petition has been filed on 05.06.2023, while the F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner no.2 on 10.06.2023, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.7.2023 Prajapati
Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sonam Yadav And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Mayank Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
