Petitioner sought quashing of an order dated 22.3.2011. The High Court held that due to efflux of time, the claim no longer survives and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19064 of 2011
Petitioner :- Smt. Meena Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.C. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
List has been revised. None appears for the petitioner in revised call. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State respondents.
Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the order dated 22.3.2011 passed by respondent no.2.
The Court has proceeded to examine the record in question and find that by efflux of time the relief claimed in the writ petition no more survive.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.1.2023 SP/
Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Meena
State of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
