Disposed

Smt. Chinka v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC26 May 2023WRIC/18234/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single bench order directs an expeditious disposal of a revenue case pending before the Tehsildar, requiring those proceedings to conclude within three months, while ensuring parties' hearing rights are protected despite lawyer non-cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude the pending revenue case within three months and permit personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

Smt. Chinka Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:118476

¶2

Court No. - 26

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18234 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Chinka Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

¶6

The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition seeking direction for expeditious disposal of Case No.2424 of 2022, (Computerized Case No.T-202217630302424 of 2022), under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending disposal before respondent no.3- Tehsildar, Tehsil Etwa, District Siddharth Nagar.

¶7

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.3- Tehsildar, Tehsil Etwa, District Siddharth Nagar to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶8

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstaining from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit the personal appearance of the parties to address the merits of the case; in case of non-appearance of the parties, the intimation to the affected parties about the present proceedings may be sent through S.H.O. concerned. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the party's substantial rights may not be adversely affected on account of the non-cooperation of the lawyers. The matter above shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with the law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after critically analyzing the material available on record.

¶9

Order Date :- 26.5.2023/Anil K. Sharma

¶10

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Chinka v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Chinka v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jay Prakash Rajbhar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Raish Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Man Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sarvajeet Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Brijesh Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Ramasharey Vs State of U.P. and 17 Others