Disposed

Subhash v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC25 May 2023WRIC/18165/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought an order for the expeditious disposal of a pending revenue case involving the petitioner. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing a subordinate authority to conclude the proceedings within six months, ensuring personal appearances if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tamkuhiraj to conclude proceedings within six months

Subhash Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:117430

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18165 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Subhash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.7917 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.T-202105440307917) (Ramayan v. Subhash & Ors.) under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 within stipulated period.

¶8

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tamkuhiraj, District-Kushinagar to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 25.5.2023 Jyotsana

¶13

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Subhash v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sheela Devi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Bramhanand Builders Private Limited Vs State of U P and 3 Others

M/S Manju Shree Agency Limited Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Indian Overseas Bank Thru Its Chief R.M. and Another Vs Union of India and 3 Others

Avnish Rai and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Reshmi Devi Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others