The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Gudiya as being infructuous because an FIR had been lodged by Respondent No. 4 against Petitioner No. 2, leading the petitioner to discontinue the current proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:155671
Court No. - 50
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16516 of 2023
Petitioner :- Gudiya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Zakir Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohit Gautam
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as F.I.R. has been lodged in the matter at the instance of respondent no. 4 against petitioner no. 2, he is no longer inclined to press present petition and the same may be dismissed as being infructuous.
Accordingly, petition stands dismissed as being infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.8.2023 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition stands infructuous due to the withdrawal of complaint against the petitioner.
Gudiya and Another
State of U.P.
3 Others
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
