Allowed

Smt. Rita Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC23 May 2023WRIC/15656/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending revenue case to prevent prejudice. The Court granted relief, directing the Tehsildar to conclude proceedings within five months and allowing personal appearance if lawyers fail to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Respondent no.2 (Tehsildar, Ghosi, District-Mau) to conclude the proceedings of Case No.201915510202046 within five months.

Smt. Rita Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:113428

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15656 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Rita Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Yadav,Someshwar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.201915510202046 (Rita v. Ram Charan) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 within stipulated period.

¶8

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

5 . In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2-Tehsildar, Ghosi, District-Mau to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of five months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

6. In case, the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 23.5.2023 Jyotsana

¶13

Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Rita Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rita Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulabh Chaudhary Vs State of U.P.

Najaruddin Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Yash Chaudhary and Others Vs State of U.P.and Others

Ram Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Hari Lal Vs State of U P and 15 Others

Sipali Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others