Disposed

Hemant Kumar Gupta and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC25 Apr 2023WRIC/12947/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of this writ petition by directing the Additional City Magistrate/Assistant Collector, Gorakhpur, to conclude the proceedings of the subject case within six months to prevent prejudice to the petitioners' rights.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Additional City Magistrate/Assistant Collector, Gorakhpur, to conclude proceedings of Case No.223 of 2013 within six months.

Hemant Kumar Gupta and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12947 of 2023

¶3

Petitioner :- Hemant Kumar Gupta And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶6

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.223 of 2013 (Computerized Case No. T20130531344104) (Ashok Kumar Vs. Amarnath Sharma and others) within a stipulated period.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioners and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶9

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional City Magistrate/ Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur (respondent no.3) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶11

Order Date :- 25.4.2023 AKShukla/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hemant Kumar Gupta and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Kumar Gupta and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Anju Devi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Kailash Nath Mishra Vs Jay Prakash Mishra and 42 Others

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Tilak Dhari Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Suchit Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kanta Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others