those referred to above, does not put any complete bar in accepting a document, executed after date of filing of the application, even for Group I applicants. In some situations, Guidelines itself contemplates acceptance of documents executed after filing of the application by Group I applicants. One such instance is contemplated under Clause 4(v)(b) where the lease agreement does not have a provision to sublease the land. In such cases, 21 days time is provided to the selected applicant to get the lease deed amended, incorporating a provision therein to sub-lease the land, albeit such a right being a legally recognized right under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 [Clauses 4 (v) (b) and 14 E (ix)]. There could be several such curable or rectifiable deficiencies, which upon correction, would not change the basic nature of the document or its subject matter. For instance, there could be mistake in spelling or figures or wrong description of line of succession of the transferor, etc. It could take the shape of some minor mistake in description of property which upon correction, does not result in change in the property conveyed or transferred. These changes would not have the effect of modifying, changing or altering the original offer of land. Such changes would be covered under Clause 14-E(ix) and (x) of the Guidelines which itself contemplates grant of opportunity to the applicant to correct ‘rectifiable deficiency’ at the stage of scrutiny of documents.