Allowed

Shyauraj Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 19 Others

Allahabad HC24 Apr 2023WRIC/10566/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing a writ petition. The court directed the Commissioner, Meerut Division, to conclude the pending proceedings of a specific computerized case expeditiously within four months after giving parties a chance to be heard. Personal appearance is permitted if lawyers do not cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Commissioner, Meerut Division to conclude proceedings of Revision No.170 of 2015 expeditiously within four months.

Shyauraj Singh and 3 Others Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 52

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10566 of 2023

¶3

Petitioner :- Shyauraj Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 19 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammed Iftekhar,Kanhaiya Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶6

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Revision No.170 of 2015, new No.02099 of 2019 (Computerized Case No. C201911000002019) (Smt. Vimlesh and others Vs. Charan Singh and others) within a stipulated period.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioners and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶9

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut (respondent no.2) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶10

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶11

Order Date :- 24.4.2023 AKShukla/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shyauraj Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 19 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyauraj Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 19 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhaiya Lal and Another Vs State of U.P. and 16 Others

Smt. Shanti Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Jitendra and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt. Anju Devi Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Kailash Nath Mishra Vs Jay Prakash Mishra and 42 Others

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others