In this writ petition challenged as C No. 10146 of 2023, the petitioner failed to appear despite a revised list. The court noted the petitioner challenged a decree in a Section 229-B suit for recall of which was rejected. Finding no case made out for interference, the writ petition was dismissed.
Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10146 of 2023
Petitioner :- Haneef And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushal Kishore Mani
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List has been revised but no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 and Sri K.K.Mani, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha-respondent No.5 are present.
Sri Mani has pointed out that the suit filed under Section 229-B of U.P.Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was decreed against which the recall application was filed by the petitioner and the same has been rejected.
From perusal of the material on record, no case for interference has been made out.
Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.4.2023 Kushal
Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed or dismissed in the absence of petitioner appearance and failure to make out a case.
Whether the recall application in the underlying suit governed by Section 229-B of U.P.Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was correctly rejected.
Haneef And 8 others
State Of U.P. And 4 others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Kushal Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
