The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the matter.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1005173 of 2006
Petitioner :- Ram Prasad
Respondent :- Commissioner Lucknow Division Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Wasim Ahmad,D.P.Singh,Dinesh Kumar Sharma,Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brijesh Kumar,Surendra Pratap Srivastav
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for the State-respondents.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.1.2023 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Prasad
Commissioner Lucknow Division
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
