Writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite a revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:78649
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1004278 of 2014
Petitioner :- M/S Rajul Elecrodes Thru Prop. Smt. Shashi Jain Respondent :- Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amarjeet Singh Rakhra,Suneet Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Krishna
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
No one has appeared for the petitioner even in the revised call.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 30.11.2023 nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
M/S Rajul Elecrodes Thru Prop. Smt. Shashi Jain
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Pankaj Bhatia
Nishant Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
