The Writ petition filed by Mishri Lal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance to press the matter. Any interim order stands vacated.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1001083 of 2014
Petitioner :- Mishri Lal Respondent :- Additional District Judge Court No. 8 Barabanki And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adnan Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Deepti Gupta,Ravindra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Case called out in revised list but none responds on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.10.2023 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mishri Lal
Additional District Judge Court No. 8 Barabanki
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
