Shiv Kumar v. 3RD Additional Session Judge Faizabad and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press the case on the listed date.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press the case on the listed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000276 of 2006
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Respondent :- 3rd Additional Session Judge Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Surat Pande,Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Learned Standing counsel is present for the State-respondents.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 5.1.2023 Pachhere/-
Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shiv Kumar
3rd Additional Session Judge Faizabad And Others
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court