Phenku v. D.D.C. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution since the petitioner did not appear to press the petition even after revised call.
What did the court decide?
Cost of Rs. 1000 to the Bank account of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, deposited for future restoration consideration.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232161
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 7839 of 1978
Petitioner :- Phenku Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Counsel for Respondent :- B.D.Mandhyan
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
- None appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition even in revised call.
- Dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited in the Bank account of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad.
- Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with proof of payment of cost.
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.12.2023 AK
Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Phenku
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/7839/1978
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court