A High Court judge dismissed a writ petition for lack of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear despite a revised call.
None; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:229504
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 50816 of 2012
Petitioner :- Madan Singh Respondent :- Dy. Director Of Consolidation Bijnor And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kripa Shanker Yadav,Mahesh Narain Singh,Sriram Dhar Dubey,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
Learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Rama Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAMAKANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Madan Singh
Dy. Director Of Consolidation Bijnor
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
