The petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed and infructuous. The respondent had no objection. The court dismissed the petition on that ground.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed and infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:237123
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3943 of 2023
Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 17 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ratnesh Kumar Pandey,Mahendra Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,Kamal Dev Singh Chanchal
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Prajapati
Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kripa Shankar And 7 Others
State Of U.P. And 17 Others
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
