Swami Nath Shukla v. State of U.P. and 31 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner complained of pending proceedings in an appeal under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The Court noted non-appearance by advocates was due to cancellation of appointments and accepted the petitioner's undertaking to appear. It directed the authority to decide the case expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
The concerned authority shall take endeavour to decide the pending appeal expeditiously.