Satish v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ relief regarding the pendency of his revision application under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The court acknowledged the undertaking not to seek adjournment and disposed of the petition, directing the authority to decide the matter expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
Direction issued to the concerned authority to endeavor to decide the pending revision expeditiously.