Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to drop consolidation proceedings. The High Court, noting related pending matters, declined to examine merits and directed the Consolidation Commissioner to decide expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:212260
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3645 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ghan Shyam Singh And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Chauhan,Saurabh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2023 AK
Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Agricultural and Industrial Syndicate Ltd. vs. State of U.P.Referred¶7
Agricultural and Industrial Syndicate Ltd. vs. State of U.P., 1976 RD 35
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ghan Shyam Singh And 8 Others
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
