Application filed for withdrawal of the writ petition. The petitioner sought withdrawal, State had no objection. Withdrawal application was allowed and writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:210964
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3367 of 2022
Petitioner :- Vimal Sonkar And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,Rajesh Kumar
Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
Ref- Civil Misc.Withdrawal Application No. 3 2023.
Heard Shri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anshul Nigam, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
The case has been taken up as a mentioned case.
This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition filed by the petitioner.
The matter has been called out twice, but none has appeared on behalf of the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition any more. He prays for the withdrawal of the writ petition.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
The withdrawal application is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 2.11.2023
Sumaira
Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vimal Sonkar
State Of U P
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
