Petitioner complained of the pendency of an objection. The court noted non-appearance of counsel due to abstention and disposed of the petition by directing the authority to decide the matter expeditiously upon petitioner's undertaking.
Ordering the concerned Authority to endeavour to decide the objection in Suit No.51 expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:182878
Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3284 of 2023
Petitioner :- Raju Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 21.9.2023 P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raju
State Of Uttar Pradesh
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
