Kamini Chauhan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for death-cum-retirement gratuity. The Court opined that the petitioner is entitled to the gratuity as her husband died before age 60 while serving as an Assistant Teacher, covered by a Government Order dated 03.02.2023. The Court granted two months for payment.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's case under G.O. dated 03.02.2023 and ensure payment of death-cum-retirement gratuity within two months.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:134743
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7601 of 2023
Petitioner :- Kamini Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durga Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Daya Ram
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondents No. 1 and 2 as well as Mr. Daya Ram Yadav, learned counsel appearing for Respondents No. 3 & 4.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the husband of the petitioner, while working on the post of Assistant Teacher in Junior High School, Gajsthal, BlockAmroha, District Amroha, died on 20.04.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that on the date of death, the age of husband of the petitioner was less than 60 years and, therefore, petitioner is entitled for death-cum-retirement gratuity but the respondents have not paid the amount due towards death-cum-retirement gratuity till date, which is absolutely arbitrary.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited attention of this Court that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been settled by this Court vide judgment and order dated 7.11.2019 passed in Writ-A No. 17399 of 2019 (Usha Rani Vs. State of U.P. and 6 others) . Learned counsel for the petitioner has also invited attention of this Court that pursuant to the aforesaid judgment of this Court, State Government itself has issued a Government Order dated 03.02.2023, wherein it is provided that if the death of any teacher working in the primary school takes place before he attains the age of 60 years then his legal heirs will be entitled for payment of death-cum-retirement gratuity and, therefore, the respondents while not paying the amount of death-cum-retirement gratuity to the petitioner is working in absolutely arbitrary manner.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to death-cum-retirement gratuity for her husband who died before attaining 60 years of age.
Whether the Government Order dated 03.02.2023 covers the petitioner's case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamini Chauhan
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
Other Respondent
- respondent
Other Respondent
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/7601/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court