Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to elapsing of time, rendering the petitioner's interest to pursue the matter lost by efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6000 of 2011
Petitioner :- Hori Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Prin. Secy. Finance Deptt. Lko.And Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Verma,Girish Chandra Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one is present for the petitioner to press the petition. Ms. Pratibha singh learned Standing Counsel is present.
It is an old matter. It appears that by efflux of time, the petitioner has lost his interest to pursue the matter.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any, stands discharged.
It is open for the petitioner to make appropriate application in case the matter still survives.
Order Date :- 3.1.2023 Rajneesh JR-PS)
Digitally signed by :- RAJNEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Hori Lal
State Of U.P.
Hori Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
