This single-paragraph order dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner had reached superannuation age and their absorption application was under consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37953 of 2012
Petitioner :- Girjesh Bahadur Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Ojha,Ashish Mohan Srivastava,D.K. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar,Bhanu Pratap Singh,K. Shahi,K.S. Shukla
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Due to subsequent events since the petitioner has reached the age of superannuation on 30.11.2021 and the application for absorption is under consideration before the respondents, therefore, prayers sought in this writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.2.2023 SB
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Girjesh Bahadur Srivastava
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
