This court allowed Writ Appeal No. 20844 of 2022 on the same terms as Writ-A No. 12287 of 2022, noting the factual identity of the two cases.
Petitioner's Writ Appeal allowed on the same terms as the judgment in Writ-A No. 12287 of 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20844 of 2022
Petitioner :- Heera Lal Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Kumar Dixit
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for State-respondents and Sri Vijay Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that present controversy is squarely covered with the judgment of this Court passed in WritA No. 12287 of 2022 decided on 22.02.2023, therefore, this petition may also be allowed of on same terms.
Learned counsels for respondents could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
Therefore, under such facts of the case, this petition is also allowed in terms of order dated 22.02.2023 passed in Writ-A No. 12287 of 2022.
Order Date :- 22.2.2023 Sartaj
Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WritA No. 12287 of 2022Followed¶6
Heera Lal
State Of U P
Another
Neeraj Tiwari
Sartaj Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
