Disposed

Hardev Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC25 Sept 2023WRIA/16031/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a lower pay band granted to the petitioner for service. With consent, the Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation, mandating the respondent to decide within six weeks with a reasoned order, without adjudicating on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit a fresh representation; respondent directed to decide within six weeks with a reasoned order.

Hardev Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:185005

¶2

Court No. - 37

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16031 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hardev Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 4.

¶6

With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.

¶7

The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Mathura to look into the discrepancy in granting pay band 2800 in place of pay band of Rs 4200 to the petitioner.

¶8

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that persons similarly circumstanced have been granted pay band of Rs 4200 while the petitioner has been granted the pay band of Rs 2800.

¶9

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mathura which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection.

¶10

In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶11

With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of .

¶12

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.

¶13

Order Date :- 25.9.2023 J. K. Dinkar

¶14

Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hardev Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hardev Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Hargovind Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Dr Bharat Ji Pandey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vijay Kumar Chaubey Vs the State of U.P. and 4 Others

Salapa Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others