The disposal order dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel, vacating any interim order.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 141 of 2004
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy. Secondary Educlation Govt.Of U.P.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
Order Date :- 26.7.2023 Gautam
Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA
STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECY. SECONDARY EDUCLATION GOVT. OF U.P.
IRSHAD ALI
GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
