This petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel despite the presence of the respondent's counsel. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1379 of 2009
Petitioner :- Rakesh Rai Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- L.D. Rajbhar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
Although learned Standing Counsel is present, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.5.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Rai
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
Vivek Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
