In Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner sought a direction to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on public land. However, the respondent produced instructions stating no encroachment existed and the land was vacant. Consequently, the court held there was no cause of action and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:223678
Court No. - 52
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2583 of 2023
Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shibli Naseem Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinay Kumar
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
