The Court disposed of a PIL alleging illegal construction of a tube well and kothri. It was found that the construction was located on a different plot (no. 80) than the one claimed (no. 137), rendering no cause of action.
The petition was disposed of as no cause of action survived due to the construction being on a different plot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:209102
Court No. - 52
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1969 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinayak Varma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sher Bahadur Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
"A. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to remove the illegal construction made over gata no. 137, area 0.181 hectare, village Gangchaura, Pargana Ujhani, Tehsil and District-Budaun."
Order Date :- 31.10.2023
Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the illegal construction alleged by the petitioner exists on the specified plot necessitating removal.
Rajendra Singh
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
