The petitioner filed a PIL seeking removal of illegal encroachments in a protected park. The court observed that proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were already initiated to address the grievance. Consequently, the court found no cause of action remaining and disposed of the petition.
The present P.I.L stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189457
Court No. - 52
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1803 of 2023
Petitioner :- Rakesh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
"i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by respondent no. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 over arazi no. 1118 category 6-3 area 0.1210 hectare recorded as Protected Ambedkar Park situated in village-Kayampur, Pargana-Saurik, Tahsil-Chhibramau, District Kannuj."
Order Date :- 3.10.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be disposed of when proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated against encroachers.
Rakesh Singh
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
Shaswat Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
