Special appeal dismissed due to unsatisfactory reasons for delay in filing. Court held no merit as established law bars relatives of Gram Pradhan from fair price shop benefits. No interference warranted.
Special appeal dismissed. Provisions of PDS regarding beneficiary eligibility upholds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:83848-DB
Court No. - 1
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 955 of 2023
Appellant :- Sarojani Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Manmohan Singh,Sandeep Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
(Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.)
Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Anand Sri./-
Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was any glaring error in the judgment passed by the learned Writ Court requiring interference.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Indrapal Singh Vs. State of U.P. & othersApplied¶4
Indrapal Singh Vs. State of U.P. & others : Writ C No.24620 of 2013
Sarojani Devi
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Civil Sectt. Lko.
Attau Rahman Masoodi
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
