The High Court dismissed Special Appeal No. 536 of 2005 for want of instructions after finding no interim order was passed in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 536 of 2005
Appellant :- District Basic Education Officer Sitapur 3647ss/1992 Respondent :- Sri Omkar Prakash Dixit And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vijay Kumar Bajpai,Rakesh Kumar Tewari,Shobhit Mohan Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kapil Dev,R.K.Srivastava
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant is present, whereas Sri Kapil Dev as also Sri R.K.Srivastava and Sri A.K. Rai, learned counsel are present for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no further instructions in the matter.
It appears from the record that no interim order was passed in the matter.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want of instructions.
( Subhash Vidyarthi, J. ) ( Ramesh Sinha, J. )
Order Date :- 23.1.2023 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
District Basic Education Officer Sitapur 3647/1992
Sri Omkar Prakash Dixit And 2 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
