The second appeal stood dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared before the court on the listed date. No substantive legal proposition is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:72424
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 694 of 1989
Appellant :- Mohd.Siddiqui And Others Respondent :- Bauddin And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd.Arif Khan Counsel for Respondent :- S.Mirza
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The instant second appeal is of the year 1989 and it has been listed today under the heading " These Cases Shall Not Be Adjourned .
None appeared for either of the parties.
In absence of the learned counsel for the parties, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution . Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd.Siddiqui And Others
Bauddin And Others
Jaspreet Singh,J.
Rakesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
