The High Court dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution after noticing that some appellants were dead and none appeared to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:78882
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 230 of 1991
Appellant :- Mohd. Rauf And Others Respondent :- Mehadi And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd.Abid Ali,S.H.Mehdi,T.R.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
None appears on behalf of the appellants to press the appeal.
The record indicates that card notice was issued to the appellants on 10.08.2023, but as per the officer report dated 13.10.2023, it is informed that the appellant Nos.2, 5, 8, 9/1 and 10 are reported to be dead.
Application for substitution is not being moved nor anyone appears to press the appeal as the card notice on the remaining appellants was duly served.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Ashutosh Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Rauf
Mehadi
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
